Volume 21: pp. 015-024

Noxious Nomenclature: Inconsistent Language Hampers Our Assessment of Invertebrate Pain, Sentience, and Awareness

Daniel M. Allman, Thomas E. White, & Kate E. Lynch

The University of Sydney

Reading Options


Abstract

Whether invertebrates possess the capacity for subjective experiences, particularly that of pain, is a frontier question in cognitive ethology. Central to this inquiry is the examination of pain-like behaviours elicited by noxious stimulation under leading sentience frameworks. Here we discuss our concerns on how the usage of the terms ‘noxious’ and ‘aversive’ in an interchangeable manner throughout past and emerging work may hamper current assessments of invertebrate pain-related literature. We briefly discuss the etymology of these terms, provide use cases that illustrate how conflation obscures interpretation, and propose a simple yet effective solution.

Keywordsbehavior, cognitive ethology, neuroscience, non-human animal, physiology

Author Note  Daniel M. Allman, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Daniel M. Allman at daniel.allman@sydney.edu.au